The emission of W^+- and Z^0 gauge bosons off fermions
is intended to be an integrated part of the initial- and final-state
radiation frameworks, and is fully interleaved with QCD and QED emissions.
It is a new and still not fully explored feature, however, and therefore
it is off by default. The weak-emission machinery is described in detail
in [Chr14]; here we only bring up some of the most relevant
points for using this machinery.
In QCD and QED showers the real and virtual corrections are directly
related with each other, which means that the appropriate Sudakov factors
can be directly obtained as a by-product of the real-emission evolution.
This does not hold for W^+-, owing to the flavour-changing
character of emissions, so-called Bloch-Nordsieck violations. These
effects are not expected to be large, but they are not properly included,
since our evolution framework makes no distinction in this respect
between QCD, QED or weak emissions. Another restriction is that there
is no simulation of the full gamma^*/Z^0 interference: at low
masses the QED shower involves a pure gamma^* component,
whereas the weak shower generates a pure Z^0.
The non-negligible W/Z masses have a considerable impact
both on the matrix elements and on the phase space for their emission.
The shower on its own is not set up to handle those aspects with a
particularly good accuracy. Therefore the weak shower emissions are
always matched to the matrix element for emission off a f fbar
weak dipole, or some other 2 → 3 matrix element that resembles
the topology at hand. Even if the match may not be perfect, at least the
main features should be caught that way. Notably, the correction procedure
is used throughout the shower, not only for the emission closest to the
hard 2 → 2 process. In such extended applications, emission
rates are normalized to the invariant mass of the dipole at
the time of the weak emission, i.e. discounting the energy change by
previous QCD/QED emissions.
Also the angular distribution in the
subsequent V = W^+-/Z^0 decay is matched to the matrix element
expression for f fbar → f fbar V → f fbar f' fbar' (FSR)
and f fbar → g^* V → g^* f' fbar' (ISR). Afterwards the
f' fbar' system undergoes showers and hadronization just like
any W^+-/Z^0 decay products would.
Special for the weak showers is that couplings are different for left- and
righthanded fermions. With incoming unpolarized beams this should average out,
at least so long as only one weak emission occurs. In the case of several
weak emissions off the same fermion the correlation between them will carry
a memory of the fermion helicity. Such a memory is retained for the
affected dipole end, and is reflected in the
property, it being +1 (-1) for fermions considered
righthanded (lefthanded), and 0 for the bulk where no choice has been
Most events will not contain a W^+-/Z^0 emission at all,
which means that dedicated generator studies of weak emissions can
become quite inefficient. In a shower framework it is not
straightforward to force such emissions to happen without biasing
the event sample in some respect. An option is available to enhance
the emission rate artificially, but it is then the responsibility of
the user to correct the cross section accordingly, and not to pick an
enhancement so big that the probability for more than one emission is
non-negligible. (It is not enough to assign an event weight
1/e^n where e is the enhancement factor
and n is the number of emitted gauge bosons. This still
misses to account for the change in phase space for late emissions by
the effect of earlier ones, or equivalently for the unwanted change in
the Sudakov form factor. See [Lon12a] for a detailed discussion
and possible solutions.)
Another enhancement probability is to only allow some specific
W^+-/Z^0 decay modes. By default the shower is inclusive,
since it should describe all that can happen with unit probability.
This also holds even if the W^+- and Z^0 produced
in the hard process have been restricted to specific decay channels.
The trick that allows this is that two new "aliases" have been produced,
Zcopy with identity code 93 and a
code 94. These copies are used specifically to bookkeep decay channels
open for W^+-/Z^0 bosons produced in the shower. For the rest
they are invisible, i.e. you will not find these codes in event listings,
but only the regular 23 and 24 ones. The identity code duplication allows
the selection of specific decay modes for 93 and 94, i.e. for only the
gauge bosons produced in the shower. As above it is here up to the user
to reweight the event to compensate for the bias introduced, and to watch
out for possible complications. In this case there is no kinematics bias,
but one would miss out on topologies where a not-selected decay channel
could be part of the background to the selected one, notably when more
than one gauge boson is produced.
Note that the common theme is that a bias leads to an event-specific
weight, since each event is unique. It also means that the cross-section
information obtained e.g. by
Pythia::stat() is misleading,
since it has not been corrected for such weights. This is different from
biases in a predetermined hard process, where the net reduction in cross
section can be calculated once and for all at initialization, and events
generated with unit weight thereafter.
The weak shower introduces a possible doublecounting problem. Namely that it
is now possible to produce weak bosons in association with jets from two
different channels, Drell-Yan weak production with QCD emissions and QCD
hard process with a weak emission. A method, built on a classification of
each event with the kT jet algorithm, is used to remove the
doublecounting. Specifically, consider a tentative final state consisting
of a W/Z and two jets. Based on the principle that the shower
emission ought to be softer than the hard emission, the emission of a
hard W/Z should be vetoed in a QCD event, and that of two hard
jets in a Drell-Yan event. The dividing criterion is this whether the
first clustering step involves the W/Z or not. It is suggested
to turn this method on only if you simulate both Drell-Yan weak production
and QCD hard production with a weak shower. Do not turn on the veto
algorithm if you only intend to generate one of the two processes.
Below are listed the variables related to the weak shower and common to both
the initial- and final-state radiation. For variables only related to the
initial-state radiation (e.g. to turn the weak shower on for ISR) see
Spacelike Showers and for
final-state radiation see
default = 1.;
minimum = 1.;
maximum = 1000.)
Enhancement factor for the weak shower. This is used to increase the
statistics of weak shower emissions. Remember afterwards to correct for
the additional weak emissions (i.e. divide the rate of weak emissions by
the same factor).
default = off)
This parameter allows to stop the weak shower after a single emission.
If on, only a single weak emission is allowed.
If off, an unlimited number of weak emissions possible.
default = off)
There are two ways to produce weak bosons in association with jets, namely
Drell-Yan weak production with QCD radiation and QCD hard process with weak
radiation. In order to avoid double counting between the two production
channels, a veto procedure built on the kT jet algorithm is
implemented in the evolution starting from a 2 → 2 QCD process,
process codes in the range 111 - 129. The veto algorithm finds the first
cluster step, and if it does not involve a weak boson the radiation of
the weak boson is vetoed when
WeakShower:vetoWeakJets is on.
Note that this flag does not affect other internal or external processes,
only the 111 - 129 ones. For the Drell-Yan process the same veto algorithm
is used, but this time the event should be vetoed if the first clustering
does contain a weak boson, see
default = off)
This flag vetoes some QCD emission for Drell-Yan weak production to avoid
doublecounting with weak emission in QCD hard processes. For more
WeakShower:vetoWeakJets above. Note that
this flag only affects the process codes 221 and 222, i.e. the main
built-in processes for gamma^*/Z^0/W^+- production, and not
other internal or external processes.
default = 0.6;
minimum = 0.1;
maximum = 2.)
The delta R parameter used in the kT clustering for
the veto algorithm used to avoid double counting. Relates to the relative
importance given to ISR and FSR emissionbs.